@prakkarinn wrote:
I want to suggest that Trimble offered a payed content warehouse where modelmakers can submit models of quality and get some small amount for each third party download. This could secure models of quality instead of sifting through thousands of horrible models to find a suitable one.
Another suggestion is to establish a like and dislike feature on the model site that works with a system of quality categories. Fro examle. If a model gets majority of dislikes it is moved down a quality category. Four categories, exellent, good, bad, terrible. Those categories could also be considered and chosen right of the bat in a ranking system.
A frequentlu disliked model in the ‘terrible’ category gets automaticly thrown out.
Models saved for personal use can be saved within each account, so the owner has access to his models.
At least there is a dire need to sort out the 3D warehouse to make it usable for professionals. I would estimate that 65-70% of the content is terrible and unusable. Ranking these models would make the warehouse considered as a source again. As of now it is an insult to most users.
Posts: 3
Participants: 2